Our Expertise > Interest Based Problem Solving > Traditional vs Interest Based Bargaining
|
Traditional vs Interest Based BargainingThere are many styles of negotiating and more than one approach may be used in any set of negotiations. The different styles of bargaining may commonly be referred to as traditional, positional, distributive or adversarial bargaining. Alternatively, you may refer to interest-based, principled, problem-solving or integrative bargaining. Models are emerging that combine these styles. Each style has its advantages and there are many variations in practice.Generally, “traditional” bargaining refers to a situation where each side places their demands and proposals on the table and the other side responds with counter-proposals. The process is characterised by a struggle of give and take.
“Principled” or “interest-based” bargaining, on the other hand, aims to solve the problems raised at the bargaining table as the negotiators focus on the interests underlying the issues and seek to satisfy all parties’ interests. Interests include the needs, desires, concerns and fears important to each side. They are the underlying reasons for a position. Teasing out an interest involves exploring “why?” – why do they want this/why don’t they want this? Some important elements of bargaining include
Four principles of best practice bargaining: Preparation: understanding the issues and the people and equipping the team for the process Relationship: developing a strategy for maintaining the relationship before, during and after negotiations Communication: building trust by applying an open communication style Problem-solving: exploring options and strategies for reaching agreement The material featured on this page was sourced directly from the Employment New Zealand and is subject to Crown copyright protection. The Crown copyright protected material may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source and copyright status should be acknowledge. |